What academia means by “diversity” is people of all colors and all sexual preferences chanting their master’s words in unison.

Steve Sailer found an interesting paper on admissions policy.

At the private institutions in their study whites from lower-class backgrounds incurred a huge admissions disadvantage not only in comparison to lower-class minority students, but compared to whites from middle-class and upper-middle-class backgrounds as well. The lower-class whites proved to be all-around losers. When equally matched for background factors (including SAT scores and high school GPAs), the better-off whites were more than three times as likely to be accepted as the poorest whites.

Having money in the family greatly improved a white applicant’s admissions chances, lack of money greatly reduced it.

Participation in such Red State activities as high school ROTC, 4-H clubs, or the Future Farmers of America was found to reduce very substantially a student’s chances of gaining admission to the competitive private colleges in the NSCE database on an all-other-things-considered basis. The admissions disadvantage was greatest for those in leadership positions in these activities or those winning honors and awards. “Being an officer or winning awards” for such career-oriented activities as junior ROTC, 4-H, or Future Farmers of America”, say Espenshade and Radford, “has a significantly negative association with admission outcomes at highly selective institutions.” Excelling in these activities is associated with 60 or 65 percent lower odds of admission.”

One Response to ““Diversity””

  1. lalit says:

    If Whites are so stupid and evil as to prey on their own, on what basis do they call claim themselves to be the superior race? Superior to who?

Leave a Reply