This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 19th, 2016 at 11:11 am and is filed under culture. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Google and skype seem to be the only ones to have caught on, and only them probably because the others are of rather lesser importance.
That said, 100 million yahoos can go back.
David Cole finds the yahoos rather useful in Los Angeles, as they have ethnically cleansed neighborhoods like Watts and Compton to the point that googles are a minority.
L.A.’s Dirty Little Brown Secret
The LA Times will report this any day now. 🙂
Bing and Yahoo work well and are pretty funny. Stuff like “Butterfly” and “Fishbucket” are simply stupid, for no company is being destroyed. People say this is it about avoiding censorship, but they are forgetting that “Google” will soon be like saying the word “nigger”, and anyone who works in a corporate environment will be terrified of saying it even in a polite context.
A quick tip: when using the non-offensive terms, make sure to use them as collective nouns instead of plurals (i.e., don’t use “Googles” or “Skypes”). Use polite and respectful expressions like “The Google people”, “The Skype people” – this will help with search engine optimization and make it hard to programmatically identify any connection with the offensive terms.
Also, I personally prefer another term for those previously and offensively known as |\/||_|5|_I|\/|5 – The Facebook people. This is a very respectful term, since they are a very pious bunch and would prefer everyone to think that they keep their faces hidden behind their Holy Qur’an all day.
Deport them each, deport them all.
Of course, since equlity works both ways, imagine a chattering office concubine: “after the ki.ke call, I had to nig.ger some facts for the report, and I was sucking on a camel jockey (tasted strangely like bitter almonds) but I got sidetracked reading those shitlord trannies over at zerohedge — I can’t even — when I saw the most amazing picture of kittens linked over at this site called encyclopedia dramatica, which totally sounds relevant to my interests right?….”
If you’re anti-white, you’re anti-white.
Im curious. being of a certain age and a native newyorker i have always been a naturally realistic race observer. But also like many despite being generally conservative libertarian since teens in the 70s also was for a while optimistic about race difference in other words while uncomfortable with moral hazard of welfare affirmative action civil rights was hopeful for a while it might end the gap. then decades of disillusionment probably starting with the bell curve and the very infamous big race cases. By the time i decide to re assess the bellcurve and its critics and find griffe d lion and all the other race realists and reactionaries almost a decade ago i happen to be living in a black neighborhood in the very very early stages of gentrification at same time.so what this information does is send me into a two year depression because the implications are well existential for one group or the others. This is no longer the left is going to crash the world economy with socialism people will suffer even die-sort of alarm Id felt my entire life. This is something literally existential, because at the same time this knowledge is being revealed we are also waking up to the fact that immigration has quietly become staggering in proportions and is suddenly unstoppable politically.
you sort of begin to hate you try not to, you remind yourself they are born as they are born and only are trying to survive, and you try to concentrate on the architects,not the pawns. Sure as a new yorker i have always known jews are liberal and often activists at least part time. but i also have half my friends are jews so its not easy to just go neo nazi.and frankly Im a pragmatists ideally ide like to flip the jews if only because i think it would be easier than having them on the other side.
but basically you find yourself wondering how your nation how the european people might be saved. but only really drastic yeah in the realm of genocide or mass expulsion seem plausible solutions and those seem really far fetched. which is another topic.
But the question is does anyone else find themselves still questioning their sanity,I mean for intents and purposes I have gone from libertarian conservative to white nationalist, i still remember judging racists perhaps not like a liberal would but still. Maybe its because Im a engineer by nature so i cant think about these issues without thinking concretely about actual solutions and actual solutions at this point are really going to cause a lot of suffering.
When you believe something that the majority of the people you are living with does not believe, it is natural to question yourself, it is natural to think, “maybe I’m wrong”. Many times in the history of man, the majority has been wrong, and the minority right. I am a Christian so I take hope in the story of Noah, not the flood part, but the fact that he was literally the last guy to believe the truth. His whole world was laughing at him, making fun of him, telling him he was stupid. As for me, I will stand with the truth, even if I am the last man on earth to do so, and the truth is that the races of men are not equal.
Have you read “Tales of new America” by Gunther Roosevelt? It shows how you could make an all white nation with minimal suffering.
Noah was a sexual pervert who cursed an innocent grandson for his own drunkeness and sexual perversion, which led to a perversion of justice. You can tell a Jew concocted that tall tale!
Furthermore, according to another sexually perverted Jew,* the people purportedly killed by the Jewgod in the flood were doing normal thing that wise European people do, like marrying normally (“marrying and being given in marriage”-Luke 17) and the magic Rabbi portrays such natural behavior as worthy of drowning.
White men should not place their hope in the Skype.
*Jesus was a typical Jewish anti-family sexual pervert, e.g.:
(1) Jesus banned normal male-female relations in his perverted paradise, in favor of angelic androgyny. (Matt. 22:30)
(2) He taught to hate every single member of your family, including hating your parents. (Luke 14:26)
(3) When a woman cheated on her man, feminist White-Knighting Jesus blamed the men and gave the cheating woman a free pass. (John 8:4-11)
(4) Jesus’ encouraged men to transition to a less manly physique by castration. (Matthew 19:11-12)
(5) Jesus carried on with his Beloved in public like a faggot. (John 13:23-25)
>> the truth is that the races of men are not equal.
Then will you repudiate the (((Bible))), or at least this passage that opposes your view?
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)
Will you condemn the International Jew for inviting adherents of “all nations” (Matthew 28:19) into your religion?
Will you condemn Philip for converting an Ethiopian Nigger (Acts 8) into your religion to be your equal brothers?
Will you condemn the church for elevating a Nigger as a “teacher and prophet” (Acts 13) over you?
Hell is forever!
No, it’s not; it’s a myth based on flat-earth cosmology. But if it were real, I wouldn’t deign to status-whore for a spot in a foreign Skype capital, race-traitor.
“Inside every Christian is a Jew.” -The Pope
There is nothing in the bible that tells us races are equal in this world.
The progressives transliterated biblical doctrines from the next world to this. Makes no sense in context.
That famous and much quoted line “There is neither Jew nor Greek” is immediately followed by a worse-than-Hitler declaration that in this world, there definitely is Jew and Greek.
You’re as intellectually dishonest as Hillary.
The point of this exercise is if you can ultimately and fundamentally repudiate, undercut, or otherwise obviate the very best (in particular, the most memetically adaptive) arguments against uncucked christianity and in favor of a cucked christianity, you’re Winning(tm).
Its a multiplayer game and you are in fact working together. Bring out all the big guns; the result will be stronger for it.
I wrote an article about Galatians 3:28.
You are attacking the wrong person, Christianity is not the problem, I am not your enemy. I can completely understand why you would hate many forms of modern Christianity, God himself said that many of the churches he would spue out of his mouth (revelation 3:16). I hate when the word of God is twisted and used differently than God intended. You insinuate that any time “context” is brought up that it is just a dodge or a cop-out, but it is the truth, context does matter, that is why we have divisions within Christianity. Many verses are interpreted in different ways, that’s why we must look at context and the Church as a whole over the centuries, and the majority of the interpretations have been friendly to our people. In Christianity the truth is extremely important. What any Christian is doing, is the same as what you are doing, we are in a quest after the truth.
Let’s not forget the context that you think foreign Skype soil is Holy Land, and you’re absconding to that great Jewish capital city in the clouds. You’ve sold out your own race for your own selfish, personal status-whoring in a pretend afterlife, all because you’ve been sold a fraudulent bill-of-goods by the Merchants.
When are you going to start thinking of White mens’ native soil as Holy Land, race traitor?
P.S. Please search Google images for, um, context:
In the context that (1) you’re a male who has a pederastic future as a “Bride of Christ” in that great Skype capital city in the clouds, and (2) in the context that in Matthew 22:30 Jesus banned normal heterosexual relationships in his pretend paradise, would you consider spending eternity in Hell with me, being Hell is the mythical Norse underworld of Loki’s half-dead daughter. At least she’s European White, right?
And you won’t risk taking it up the ass from a perverted Magic Skype.
That only looks queer in a society where gay sex is normalized.
In a society where gays get the high jump, men can hold hands and kiss such, David can declare his love for Jonathan, and there are no homosexual implications.
Islamic State has the cure for this problem.
Father Thyme says: October 20, 2016 at 9:10 pm
P.S. Please search Google images for, um, context:
how dumb are you?
you DO realize that none of those painters ever saw the Apostles or Jesus or ever saw how they interacted with each other?
those portrayals are PROJECTIONS of social conditions from the ARTISTS time.
Many verses are interpreted in different ways, that’s why we must look at context and the Church as a whole over the centuries, and the majority of the interpretations have been friendly to our people.
Any time someone snags a communist sex cult quote from the bible, “neither man nor woman”, well, that is not how the communion of saints interpreted it.
Really I would like an ancestor worship religion, in which the Aesir and the Vanir are the two tribes ancestral to the Aryans, but we have not got the makings for that. Today’s pagans are gay and lesbian wiccans. The nearest thing we have to that is the communion of saints, which is not too bad at all. The communion of Saints was what progressives would call “Worse than Hitler”.
“But the question is does anyone else find themselves still questioning their sanity”
so now thats settled how do we get from here to there
No idea, but it probably involves hyperinflation, and hyperinflation is probably coming.
We have done it before, and we can do it again.
Step 1. Become more organized in real life via http://www.knightsofthewest.com and other groups, knowing that not all of us are going to agree on all points, but we agree that the USA no longer serves our people, and in fact is a danger to our people.
Step 2. Petition the government for redress of our grievances.
Step 3. Allow ample time for redress.
Step 4. Repeat step 2.
Step 5. Allow ample time for redress.
Step 6. Repeat step 2.
Step 7. Allow ample time for redress.
Step 8. Draft document stating that we have petitioned the government for redress of our grievances several times, with no response, or no action.
Step 9. Draft document that states we wish to separate all political ties from current government and form our own government, detailing what land we will occupy.
Step 10. Submit the documents to the government.
Back in the day we had our own when terms like ‘nigger’ and ‘chink’ became obscenities.
Pakie = mudflap
Chink = clipper = nine iron
natives = chugs = red niggers
blacks = tar babies
Not many joos out in my neck of the woods but if there had been we would have discriminated against them too! You won’t be fooling the social justice warriors with your cute code names – you’ll probably only whip them into a bigger fury of lunacy and hate. I’m stocking up on popcorn and ammo.
“You won’t be fooling the social justice warriors with your cute code names”
That’s not the idea. The idea is to fool the autobanning algorithms that are allegedly being developed.
Autobahning algorithms though, now that’s a completely different story.
[distant helicopter sound]
also to insult Google and damage their brand by making it mean the type of monkey seen when using Google image search to find “White woman with child”.
We need to have a Google Hangout with the people responsible for each of those pictures.
Also with those dhimmicrat activists indicated in the O’Keefe video responsible for all those instances of Google Play .
And if they try to sue people for trying to degrade their brand, they’ll have to explain that no one like googles.
search “white woman with child”
Time to warm up the gas chambers.
Yes, “cute lingo” is nearly always cowardly dodging. It’s plebian.
Coded, quickly evolving, language that ensures plausible deniability is perfectly normal for a communist country. Nothing cute about it. It’s as “cowardly” as using a pseudonym, and attacking it is exactly as stupid. “Show your real faces so we can ruin your life!” Sure, right away.
This case however is not about that.
“By all accounts the lexicon seems to have been conceived on 4chan—a message board famous for its trolls—as a response to Google’s improved method for identifying pages and comments with offensive content and potentially removing or flagging them. The title of the 4chan post that seems to have started it all is “RIP alt-right trolls, SkyNet is coming for you.” The trolls responded with a loosely organized effort called “Operation Google,” which aims to get around these algorithms, and to trick them into blocking the names of their own services and companies.”
HAR HAR HAR!
That’s AWESOME. I will disagree with you Mr. Perrick, there is nothing cowardly or plebeian about giving the finger to language and thought police. Thanks to them we now live in a world where it is a bigger crime to be called a nigger than it is to act like one – and we have that black baboon in the Whitehouse and his rioting tribes of howler monkeys to show for it.
I’m especially fond of the term ‘vibrants’. ALL the bad guys get the finger when terms like that are used to describe the usual suspects.
Google and Skype really do seem to be gaining traction – definitely a worthy slap in the face to the nation-destroying Skypes at Google.
‘Skype’ applied in this fashion has almost all the phonetic strength of its near-rhyme ‘kike’, which is a major reason why it works so well. And ‘google’ has excellent verbal associations with the venerable ‘golliwog’, ‘goggle-eyed’ and ‘boogeyman.’
And of course, the original terms remain in the bargain, with inverted meanings. For example, I particularly enjoy it when shitlibs ask what the hell I mean by, say, ‘all the Skype cabal outing themselves over Trump’s West Palm Beach Speech.’
I tell them ‘open up Chrome and nigger it.’
PS: Lately, I’m liking ‘open up Chrome and niggle it’ even more.
Niggling little niglets.
**how to not be offensive**
Stop splitting infinitives.
That reminds me of the time in freshman English that the teacher nailed some kid for using a double negative, because she said that mathematically a double negative is positive.
I asked her if, conversely, there existed the possibility that a double positive could mean a negative.
She said curtly, “No.”
I replied, “Yeah, yeah.”
I got sent to the principles office.
Next week: Never use a preposition to end a sentence with.
That is actually pretty funny.
@Jim : do consider joining #trilema* on Freenode sometime. Here’s a client** if you don’t have one.
PS. Your problem with the comments is due to you having an empty string that should equal “blog.jim.com” somewhere in the pile.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Jim's Blog is proudly powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).