Putin reads Roissy

Putin mysteriously disappears from the press for ten days, then upon reappearance:

Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov greeted reporters Monday with sarcastic remarks: “So, have you seen the president paralysed and seized by the generals? He has just come back from Switzerland where he attended the delivery.”

Asked if Putin’s condition required treatment by an osteopath, the spokesman retorted: “Yes, the osteopath was with the generals.”

He treats the Cathedral as if it was a girl who was shit testing him. Which, since female emancipation, is not that far from what it is.

Disappear for a bit to get the hamster running. Upon reappearance, agree and amplify.

37 Responses to “Putin reads Roissy”

  1. Thales says:

    More like Roissy “reads” guys like Putin.

  2. Hidden Author says:

    You’re acting as though the speculation about Putin’s disappearance is just infotainment for low-information media consumers but what if Putin really was overthrown by a coup? We’ll have to wait and see!

    • jim says:

      Low information consumers like Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times, the people to whom the fall of the Soviet Union came out of nowhere as a complete surprise.

      Yes, If we wait, we shall see that they are ignorant dolts.

    • Mark Citadel says:

      As long as its a coup from his right flank, who cares? The more anti-Modern and anti-Atlanticist Russia’s leaders the better. A coup from the left however would be devastating.

      • peppermint says:

        Obama’s right flank means binders full of women, yo speako el spanisho, close the border, amnesty, and full faith and credit to citizens, forced integration but this time trying a bit harder to enforce a bit better manners, sex ex not in kindergarten but in high school that includes homosexualism but not talking about abortions, and it collapses back into Obamunism within he decade.

        • Mark Citadel says:

          True, but the comparison is somewhat shaky. Putin is considerably to the right of Obama. He is on the illiberal side of the spectrum, but with the threats Russia faces, they could do with an even more illiberal president. Ideally, Russia should see its monarchy restored.

          • Peppermint says:

            Franco worked so hard, then gave the country to John Charles, and now the sons of Spain are heroin addicts while the daughters are fucking semi-legal Africans.

            John Charles is the last Bourbon on a throne, since Louis bankrupted France putting a Bourbon on the Spanish throne, accepting in the end the provisio that the monarchies would not be united, which as effectualized by the dissolution of the French monarchy; considering his family’s performance, I hope he is the last.

            Which duc de Romanoff do you think should be on the Imperial Russian throne? Hopefully a puppet of the Orthodox church, who will buy Greece and then exercise the Greek claim to Constantinople and western Anatolia, and in domestic policy, not give anything to faggots and single moms. But maybe they’ll get a puppet of the Orthodox church who will rescind Russia’s claim to Chechnya while giving work permits to Chechens and money and jobs to single moms of half Chechen babies.

          • Mark Citadel says:

            “Hopefully a puppet of the Orthodox church, who will buy Greece and then exercise the Greek claim to Constantinople and western Anatolia, and in domestic policy, not give anything to faggots and single moms.”

            Now, now, Peppermint. There is a limit to optimism. If such a great man who could do all that exists today, let him rise and make himself known. I’d gladly call him King.

            As for the Chechens, perhaps it would be in Russia’s interest to recognize the Islamic State. Begin deportations Monday.

          • R7_Rocket says:

            Vladimir Putin really should be named Tsar. To make De Jure, what was De Facto.

  3. Dave says:

    Do Iran’s leaders read Jim’s Blog? They just proposed a law to ban all forms of birth control, and a law to promote the hiring of married men with children:

    http://www.newsweek.com/irans-plan-boost-declining-birth-rate-block-access-birth-control-312984

    Do you think these laws will have the desired effect?

    • peppermint says:

      did Hitler make any stronger moves? Only removing subsidies for women’s education and women in the workplace will reduce the number of women delaying marriage and disrupting workplaces and educational environments. But subsidies for married men, paid for out of taxes on married men, is, I suppose, the kind of program that you can implement in a low-IQ country to make feminists see red while making married men think they’re getting a good deal.

      • Just sayin' says:

        Iran is also banning wimmenz from some majors in university.

        “In early August 2012 it was reported that 36 universities in Iran have proposed cutting 77 fields of study from the female curriculum, making them male-only fields.[6] Such courses include empirical sciences, the human sciences, the arts and foreign languages.”

        Specific universities gave various arguments in favor: Oil Industry University claimed the “lack of employer demand”,[5] and Isfahan University stated that from those that obtained mining engineering degrees “98% of female graduates don’t work in this area”…

        “Some fields are not very suitable for women’s nature such as agricultural machinery or mining, partly because of the hard work involved in them. Past experience shows that women do not become professionally active in these fields after they are admitted to these subjects and even after they graduate. This results in unemployment of graduates”.

        Iran is making a pretty good effort, even if they haven’t hit on the solution yet, or pushed hard enough. They’re already getting a lot of pushback, apparently.

        • jim says:

          Let us look at a Muslim country with dramatic fertility collapse, and see if we can find any of the usual suspects.

          So I looked at Iran

          1: Harvard on the Arvan Rud.

          While most of Iranian society is pretty much what one would expect of a Muslim society, for example poor employment prospects for women, legal enforcement of husband’s authority, and so on and so forth, school and University is Harvard on the Arvan Rud. Despite lower female intelligence, smaller female brains, and the fact that very few girls will wind up in employment (the rest of society still being quite Muslim) 62% of people admitted to university are female and only 38% are male. Schools and universities consider it their mission to raise female status and denigrate male status, to transform those horrid old fashioned obsolete unprogressive aspects of Islam. All students are compelled to attend courses urging them to have fewer children, and denigrating marriage and motherhood.

          2. Who cares about 2? OK: 2 is Sodom and Gomorrah in Harvard on the Arvan Rud. Iranian girls are very strictly controlled until they get to university, coed university, whereupon … most of them are ruined for any man who would be inclined to marry her, since they will now see him as low status and insufficiently handsome and manly.

          I recommend that the ayatollahs behead some professors if they hope to restore patriarchy.

          • Samson J. says:

            I have a friend – at least, I don’t know her very well but I do consider her more than a mere “acquaintance”. Anyway she grew up in Iran and trained as an OBGY there; according to her own account (which I believe), she was one of the brightest young women in her grade in the whole country.

            How she ended up coming to Canada, I don’t know. She has one child, a son, and no husband that I ever heard of. I would love to know more about her personal history but I don’t know her well enough to delve into that sort of thing with her. I do know that at times she has hinted that she would be interested in “exploring” herself a little bit. I expect she’s only ever slept with one man in her life and is curious about what Western men would be like.

            • jim says:

              It is unlikely that a woman with a fatherless child has only slept with one man in her life. Women’s sexual histories are usually a lot more adventurous than most men believe, or most women admit.

          • Peppermint says:

            get on that bro stick it in her pooper before roosh does dawg

            also, what exactly are you trying to insinuate? That high-status school girls make mistakes, that single moms want ur chose, or that iran is full of backdoor sluts?

        • jim says:

          Iran is making a pretty good effort

          Not until they purge Wimmin’s studies and everyone connected to them, they are not making a good effort.

          If some courses lead to a 98% unemployment rate for women, this probably indicates that employers are getting wise to affirmative action graduation rates. To fix the problem, you need to destroy the careers of those people who arranged the intake and graduation of unqualified and incompetent women. You don’t get a sex ratio that favors women unless something shady has been going on.

          In order to restore patriarchy, have to make it high status and a good career move to be in favor of patriarchy, and low status and a bad career move to undermine patriarchy – white knighting has to be offensive and illegal.

    • jim says:

      No

      What would have the desired effect is compelling women and children to treat adult males with respect.

      If you are worried about fertility, ask how often a female subordinate interrupts her boss.

      • fnd says:

        They can treat males with respect if money falls short

        • Peppermint says:

          Or start confiscating and terrorizing and murdering, That’s the Christian solution, and the Islamic solution, and the socialist solution

          • R7_Rocket says:

            Hard to confiscate, terrorize and murder with your troops if you don’t have the money to pay them and buy their equipment.

          • peppermint says:

            no it isn’t. It’s hard to get your troops not to confiscate, terrorize, and murder, you need to train and pay them. Also, White men aren’t naturally as interested in doing those things, but if you tell them that their enemies are rebelling against God by expelling kikes on enslaving niggers, your White troops will be the most thoroughly cruel army the world has ever seen other than the Jewish Cheka / NKVD / KGB that overran Eastern Europe liquidating the White aristocracy and middle class.

          • R7_Rocket says:

            @peppermint
            “no it isn’t.”

            The non-military mind has spoken. Weapons and ordinance aren’t free. Troops have to be paid, even thoroughly motivated warriors like the Taliban and ISIS. Going to war and terrorizing your opponents isn’t cheap. Here’s a man who joined an Assyrian militia, he had to sell his large holdings just to get the necessary equipment:

            http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2015/02/british-bouncer-sells-his-home-and-joins-christian-militia-2976288.html

            It doesn’t surprise me that a former Occupy protestor and Chan denizen thinks that logistics doesn’t matter… And weapons and ammo (it’s obvious that you don’t know anything about purchasing ammo) come out of thin air for the soldier to use for attacking his enemy. Former Chan denizen also thinks that armies don’t need to be fed, apparently.

            fnd is right. Can’t field an army without paying for its supplies and personnel.

          • Peppermint says:

            I dunno, niggers seem capable of confiscating and raping and terrorizing on the cheap. The US government doesn’t need to pay them directly much more than some food stamps and Section 8, can force you military logistical guys to give them jobs and sheeit. Oh, and take half your earnings, and give you some complementary healthcare for it.

            What’s that? No fair fighting a war without uniforms? Skin = uniform lol

          • Peppermint says:

            You can take the saddest dregs of Pakistan, give them a status of forces agreement that makes them answerable only to Sharia courts, and they’ll be raping millions of English girls in no time. Why would you think superior firepower is the only way to fight a war?

          • R7_Rocket says:

            “I dunno, niggers seem capable of confiscating and raping and terrorizing on the cheap.”

            Maybe the nig nogs just snap their fingers to cause $20,000 rims to magically appear on their $1,000 cars… or maybe, peppermint should not bother replying on military matters.

            Amateurs study tactics. Professionals study logistics.

            Every successful fighting force knows this, including even drug lords and their private armies.

          • R7_Rocket says:

            “You can take the saddest dregs of Pakistan, give them a status of forces agreement that makes them answerable only to Sharia courts, and they’ll be raping millions of English girls in no time.”

            The Pakistani rapists in Britain are protected by the superior firepower of Pax Americana. I’m pretty sure you know that Europe was conquered by Pax Americana, right?

    • Thales says:

      The answer to every variation of “Will this convoluted method of restoring Patriarchy through the back door have the same effect as restoring Patriarchy?” is no.

    • Dave says:

      Jim, you could make a good living as a consultant for authoritarian regimes looking to restore patriarchy and increase their birth rates. They’re trying to do it themselves but failing because they don’t see the whole picture.

  4. Alan J. Perrick says:

    Something fishy about this quote:

    “In August 2012, as the country saw its first demographic growth since the 1990s, President Putin declared that Russia’s population could reach 146 million by 2025, mainly as a result of immigration.[40]”

    http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia

  5. Dan says:

    What Putin should do right now is say something empathetic toward Israel and offer to be the veto Israel needs on the UN Security Council. It would cost Putin nothing and beta America deserves to have a better man make a move in on his girl.

  6. […] has some final remarks on Nationalism, Whiteness, and Kin. Also, he applauds Putin’s deft passing of Cathedral fitness tests. And late-breaking science reporting from Jim: High reproductive variance among males, in which the […]

  7. Sofia says:

    The honest Nemtsov, was NOT afraid of revealing how rotten Putin and the Kremlin are. And, he was on the verge of revealing damning evidence about Putin’s and Russia’s direct involvement in Ukraine:

    • Peppermint says:

      I would be shocked to hear that Putin was directly involved th the Ukraine situation and it would make me rethink my reflexive hatred for the EU’s position.

Leave a Reply