Scott, good progressive that he is, is horrified by the fact that reactionaries use the word “sluts” and feels that reactionaries are being illogical and inconsistent to endorse different standards for different genders. Which argument, like all his arguments, presupposes that men and women are exactly alike and everyone knows this and believes it. So it is completely unnecessary for him to bother producing any argument for the proposition that men and women are alike.
Scott cannot believe that reactionaries say what they say and mean what they mean, and assures us that reactionaries do not really think that different standards apply to men than to women, and different standards should apply. That would just be too awful even for reactionaries to think!
He piously explains that now that we have contraception and all that, there is no longer any reason for the old fashioned view of sluts.
He seems to have failed to notice that we have approximately fifty percent fatherlessness, (illegitimacy plus early divorce) and fatherlessness is strongly correlated with very bad outcomes for children – and civilizations.
Without posterity, soldiers will not fight, businessmen will not invest, and leaders will steal instead of lead. The big problem with sluttiness is not disease. The big problem is that without security of paternity, men will not invest in the the future, and thus, civilizations without security of paternity disappear from history.
Which is why society as a whole should penalize sluts. Sluts cause collective externalities far more serious than tobacco smokers. Because of the grave and great externalities produced by sluts, they should be taxed and penalized, like tobacco smokers, only at considerably higher rates, rather than subsidized, and subjected to official shaming and exclusion similar to that applied to tobacco smokers, only more severe.
Marry a slut, you will likely get divorced: alimony, charges of child abuse, lose your children.
Which is why men as individuals should discriminate against sluts. Sluts are dangerous and hurtful to the men in their lives, which is why you should bang them but stay out of their lives.
You can take the girl out of the bar, but you cannot take the bar out of the girl. Because a girl can have sex with a much more desirable man than she can marry or have a relationship with, if she has slept with thirty men before you, she has slept with thirty men who were handsomer than you, richer than you, have bigger tools than you, more self confident and socially skilled than you, but since those guys did not return her calls the morning after, and she realizes she is now running out of eggs, since she is having a lot fewer abortions than she used to, she has decided to reluctantly settle for you.
And then, of course, there are those infamous open relationships, or polyamorous relationships, where you get to sleep on the couch, and clean up the love stains on the main bed. Polyamory resembles a Sultan’s harem. One sultan, lots of eunuchs. If a girl tells you she wants an open relationship, you are not the sultan.
If a woman decides on the option for casual sex, she will have casual sex with a man who is a lot more desirable than any man she has a relationship with, or is likely to be able to have a relationship with. So you should not be that guy that has a relationship with that girl. Sluts are good only for pump and dump, because any man that they can have a relationship with, they will despise.
For men, there is an equivalent to a girl being easy. If a man who wants to marry young, reveals that he wants to marry young, no woman will want him. Women despise men who are eager to have a relationship, even good women despise men who are eager to have a relationship, just as men despise women who are eager to have sex. If you are a man who wants to marry a good woman, you need to marry young. If you want to marry young, cultivate your inner dark triad, and let her believe she miraculously tamed the wild one. Taming the lovem and leavem cad is what women want, as marrying a virgin is what men want. So you are not going to marry a virgin, if the virgin girl thinks you are a virgin also. The double standard works both ways. Men like virgins, women don’t like virgins. That includes supposedly Christian women. Perhaps especially Christian women.
The male equivalent of a slut is a man who is looking for a relationship with a woman. Women instantly despise him, as men instantly despise a woman who is looking for a quick bang. So, if you are looking to marry a virgin (which you should), don’t let it be known. Instead let it be known that you are looking to pop a virgin to add to your notch count.
Sluts are bad for civilization, and bad for individual men, so men do not like them, and should not like them.
Rakes, however, men who sleep with lots of women, men who have sex rather than relationships with women … women do like them. Everyone admires the man who has sex with lots of women, because that is hard, while everyone despises the woman that has sex with lots of men, because that is easy.