“View from the right” is Christian rightist, and there they are arguing all men are made in the image of God, and therefore, equally entitled to rights and dignity.
Of course, they can argue this without being totally insane since they believe that everyone has an immortal soul inside, regardless of physical and mental inequality and propensity to depraved acts, but when Christians ditched their Christianity, while retaining equalism, thus becoming progressives, which began with the anti slavery movement and was more or less completed in the late 1940s, early 1950s, then, having ditched immortal souls, they then had to argue that men and women, blacks and whites, and so on and so forth were all literally equal in mean and distribution, which position is transparently insane and contrary to casual observation and common sense.
Of course, if you believe in Darwinism, then we are not equal, not individually, nor are the groups to which we belong equal. Further, we are not made in the image of God, but are risen killer apes, and not very far risen at that. Without civilization, custom, culture and such, we would all be back to killing and perhaps eating any stranger or outsider fast enough.
Further, that thin veneer of civilization over our native and natural killer ape tendencies is fragile. To extend it to people far away requires elaborate arrangements, which arrangements have to be maintained and enforced.
This latter fact, that we still are killer apes, and apt to prove it from time to time, provides a Darwinian justification for “hate” laws. Crimes between blacks and whites, crimes between men and women, crimes between religious sects, and so on and so forth perhaps need to be treated with greater severity because of the propensity for collective conflict. But if that is our justification, then we really need to be cracking down on blacks, who commit the vast majority of race hate crimes, and Muslims, who commit the vast majority of religious hate crimes. And something needs to be done about women, who are usually the ones breaking up families and destroying the lives of their children. In practice “hate” laws are directed against one group, and one group only: White males, primarily working class white males, thus such laws are thus themselves a manifestation of the hatred and intolerance that they supposedly ban, and thus themselves promote the group conflict that they purportedly suppress. It was “Tolerance” that gave us Major Hasan’s massacre at Fort Hood.
This was obvious in the recent Chick-fil-A protests. Which side demonstrated hatred, bigotry, and intolerance?
As the state and the laws are undermining, rather than promoting civilization, our killer ape nature is likely to soon be on full display. It is not in our nature to maintain civilized conduct with strangers, with people far away, with people very different from ourselves. Such arrangements have to be built, and have to be maintained, and they are not being maintained.
Most apes seldom kill members of their own species, and never make war. Chimps and men make war. Most apes are vegetarians. Chimps and bonobos are omnivores. Humans are close to being carnivores, in that in the ancestral environment you died if you did not eat some substantial amount of meat, and the stable isotope ratios found in the collagen of ancient bones indicates that primitive humans ate at about the same or higher trophic level as wolves and hyenas – meaning that they ate what wolves and hyenas ate, plus they sometimes ate wolves and hyenas, and, perhaps, sometimes each other. This suggests that humans evolved intelligence largely to facilitate cooperative violence. Humans that cooperated better tended to wipe out humans that cooperated worse. Chances are, our species is what it is because of a persistent inclination to genocide.
The Nazis killing the Jews was a really bad idea. The Nazis should have done what the progressives are doing, and absorbed them. Not only did all the smartest Jews get the hell out of Germany, some of them went to America and set to work on the atom bomb. Hitler did not get the bomb in substantial part because he got rid of “Jewish Science”. On the other hand, getting rid of the bushmen, the Amerindians, and the Australian aboriginals worked out fine. It tends to be a seriously bad idea to deliberately pursue conflict with a group that is smarter and better at cooperating than your own group. On the other hand, pursuing conflict with a group that is stupider and less capable of cooperating than your own group usually works out very nicely. Thus the superior group should be more aggressive as a group, recklessly getting close to group conflict, and the inferior group should be more tolerant, seeking to assimilate, and seeking peace. Thus our laws and customs should be less tolerant of black race hate crimes than white race hate crimes, not more tolerant. Similarly, profiling should be encouraged, not only in crime watch, but also as a sanity check on test results and credit ratings. People who race horses do not collect all foals equally, train them equally, race them, then select those who race the best for special training and further racing. They select the foals with the best bloodlines, and give those special training, relying both on test results and ancestry.