<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Average temperatures to 2008-October</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html</link>
	<description>Liberty in an unfree world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-89656</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jim.com/?p=283#comment-89656</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the idea of global warming comes from scientific background not religous&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have read most of the climategate emails.  There is not one email that has a scientific outlook.  These are the emails of a political, religious, and evangelical organization.

Some of the emails smell a lot worse than others, “Mike&#039;s Nature trick to … hide the decline” but every single email, every single one that I read, smells at least a little funny.  There is not one innocent email in the entire pile.

If you think there is one innocent email in the entire pile, show me that one email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the idea of global warming comes from scientific background not religous</p></blockquote>
<p>I have read most of the climategate emails.  There is not one email that has a scientific outlook.  These are the emails of a political, religious, and evangelical organization.</p>
<p>Some of the emails smell a lot worse than others, “Mike&#8217;s Nature trick to … hide the decline” but every single email, every single one that I read, smells at least a little funny.  There is not one innocent email in the entire pile.</p>
<p>If you think there is one innocent email in the entire pile, show me that one email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-89632</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jim.com/?p=283#comment-89632</guid>
		<description>Interesting chart and ideas that make sense. though the little religous thing you threw in at the end kind of throws alot of your credibility off. mainly because, the idea of global warming comes from scientific background not religous. also if were talking about the way the US looks at global warming the idea is supported by way more democrats than republicans. and on average the republicans are the religous ones. also using your logic you cant completely throw out the idea of global warming though in the next thirty to fourty years will we see if the idea of global warming is real, and by then it may be to late. and whether its real or not the changes that people say should be taken to counteract this global warming would not hurt humans. things like useing less oil and coal are not so extreme or even hard to do. but whether global warming happens or doesnt it never hurts to be prepared, especially when those preperations would be beneficial to the world and the people of the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting chart and ideas that make sense. though the little religous thing you threw in at the end kind of throws alot of your credibility off. mainly because, the idea of global warming comes from scientific background not religous. also if were talking about the way the US looks at global warming the idea is supported by way more democrats than republicans. and on average the republicans are the religous ones. also using your logic you cant completely throw out the idea of global warming though in the next thirty to fourty years will we see if the idea of global warming is real, and by then it may be to late. and whether its real or not the changes that people say should be taken to counteract this global warming would not hurt humans. things like useing less oil and coal are not so extreme or even hard to do. but whether global warming happens or doesnt it never hurts to be prepared, especially when those preperations would be beneficial to the world and the people of the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jim.com/?p=283#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I am going to issue a more up to date chart shortly, the new one showing both the rolling twelve month average global temperature, and the seasonally adjusted global ice area anomaly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to issue a more up to date chart shortly, the new one showing both the rolling twelve month average global temperature, and the seasonally adjusted global ice area anomaly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin McDevitt</title>
		<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/global-average-temperatures-to-2008-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin McDevitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jim.com/?p=283#comment-564</guid>
		<description>What is the base year for this chart?  It would be helpful information to know when the 0 degree average change is from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the base year for this chart?  It would be helpful information to know when the 0 degree average change is from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

