Racism

“Racist” is just a hate word for white, therefore I am not racist, merely white. I am anti anti racist.

“Racist” has multiple, vague, slippery, and shifting definitions. I think it is really bad news to live close to blacks, and property owners should be entitled to protect themselves against what happened to those owning property in Ferguson. I think that blacks are, on average, genetically inferior. I think that the genetic and cultural differences between genetic and cultural groups are such that they need different laws, de-facto or de-jure, and in particular that blacks should be subject to different laws than whites, laws that are simpler, harsher, and more restrictive. And in practice, we see that in highly progressive left wing towns like San Francisco, blacks are furtively subjected to different laws than whites.

Those that have a ready supply of numerous different definitions of racism, which definitions they selectively apply in some circumstances and refrain from applying in other circumstances, will undoubtedly find that a pile of my positions fit a pile of their definitions. And I don’t care.

15 Responses to “Racism”

  1. Recusancy says:

    >“Racist” is just a hate word for white
    Not quite.

    The average American believes that all men are equal. Since blacks do not have as much money as Whites, society is oppressing them in various vague ways. Or oppressed them in the past.

    Therefore, we must treat blacks as superiors in policy to correct this evil. We see this in Affirmative Action, the War on Poverty, and absurd/excessive civil rights which are essentially given only to blacks.

    “Racist” primarily refers to two groups:

    1) Someone who continues the oppression of the black race, by refusing to treat them as superiors.

    2) Someone who says things that support the oppression of the black race, by refusing to acknowledge they ought to be treated as superiors.

    The equivalent English terms were:

    1) “Insubordinate” or “Petty Traitor”

    2) “Heretic” or “Blasphemer”

  2. R7_Rocket says:

    Ask a leftist to define “racist” and “racism”… they usually refuse to answer directly or if they do, they show their hand in using the term to attack white people.

  3. fnd says:

    “And in practice, we see that in highly progressive left wing towns like San Francisco, blacks are furtively subjected to different laws than whites.”
    Can you give examples? It is something like Australia drinking laws?

    • jim says:

      Australian drinking laws are less furtive, since booze is banned where there are too many blacks, and not banned where there are few blacks, and the cops drop in on black parties and bust them for illegal booze.

      Rather, what happens in San Francisco is what the blacks are complaining about in Ferguson, that they are stopped and arrested for stuff that a white would not be stopped for, and if stopped, not arrested. Hence the joke “dope smoking while white”, meaning that whites can smoke dope and not get arrested.

      However, the difference is that the white smoking dope is probably a college student who can afford a lawyer, and the black smoking dope is probably a petty burglar who cannot.

      • peppermint says:

        I heard that the Ferguson police get something like a quarter of their funding by preying on whoever there is in Ferguson with the money to pay fines.

        The Whites are about to leave en masse because the place has become much less safe recently, and when they don’t have any taxpayers left, they’ll need to rely even more on fines.

        Blacks should complain about being fined for stuff that in a decent town the police would give you a verbal warning for, if even pull you over. And they should be laughed at for being worthless shitskins who are unable to maintain a city.

      • Recusancy says:

        A significant portion of that is the neighborhood too. Police are much harsher in high-crime (a.k.a. black) areas of a city.

  4. Wyrd says:

    Anyone who wants to toss around the word Racism should be made to prove he has read The Iliad, The Odyssey, and The Bible,

    • peppermint says:

      haha, who the hell actually reads the bible? its like 10,000 pages long and filled with all kinds of nonsense

      • Trimegistus says:

        Everyone should read the Bible. ESPECIALLY atheists. It’s one of the keystone texts of Western civilization. Not reading it means you’re a cultural illiterate.

        • Zach says:

          How about if I read it, and hardly remember a damn thing? Does your stunning insight still include me as being a cultural illiterate? Or am I in some kind of cultural purgatory?

          I hope I have passed phase 1, at the very least. Your condemnation would prove to be too much. Maybe I’d just blow up in a pile of gibs the moment you clicked on “Submit Comment” as the cosmos awaits your reply?

  5. Cheech And Chong Found God says:

    God has made it clear regarding racism–it is an affront to everything He stands for.

    Galatians 3:28—There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

    Romans 2:11—For God shows no partiality.

  6. […] from Jim this week, some commentary regarding the Dire Statistic: Power laws in polygyny. And Racism Schmacism. Also this: explaining an Ever Purer Islam, which lies in stark contrast with the dingier, only so […]

Leave a Reply