<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jim's Blog &#187; excon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jim.com/tag/excon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jim.com</link>
	<description>Liberty in an unfree world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Exxon blows it</title>
		<link>http://blog.jim.com/economics/exxon-blows-it.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jim.com/economics/exxon-blows-it.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas to oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jim.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan Caplan wonders if oil prices are a bubble.
When oil spikes abruptly, that means people made incorrect investment decisions &#8211; under invested in exploration, development, and gas to liquids conversion.
A simple back of the envelope calculation tells me they are still under investing. Exxon recently abandoned gas to liquids plant that would be profitable if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Caplan <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2008/05/oil_inventories.html">wonders</a> if oil prices are a bubble.</p>
<p>When oil spikes abruptly, that means people made incorrect investment decisions &#8211; under invested in exploration, development, and gas to liquids conversion.</p>
<p>A simple <a href="../economics/coal-to-oil-is%E2%80%A6er-developmentcoal-to-oil-is-not-under-development.html">back of the envelope</a> calculation tells me they are still under investing. Exxon recently abandoned gas to liquids plant that would be profitable if oil remains above forty dollars to fifty dollars a barrel. But if everyone acts like that – and everyone is acting like that – oil is going to be <em><strong>way</strong></em> above fifty a barrel.</p>
<p>Do I hear someone saying “Hey. Do you think you are lot smarter than the guys running Exxon?”</p>
<p>It is quite simple.  For the price of oil to remain stable at present levels, we need to accommodate China’s industrialization by producing a lot more oil each year.  The planned increases in oil production add up to peanuts.  So the price of oil is heading up, and going to stay up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jim.com/economics/exxon-blows-it.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
