Police fine with left wing violence

Milo attempted to give a talk. Leftists arrived to blockade the talk and prevent people from entering. The blockade was allowed to succeed, in that only those who came early got in. People who merely arrived on time were prevented from entering.

Bricks, firecrackers and paint were thrown at officers and others — and then a gunshot rang out.

Seattle Police Chief Kathleen O’Toole said there were no arrests and no serious injuries other than the shooting on the UW campus. “Things went well,” she said

Evidently I am a bit old fashioned, but it seems to me that if bricks are thrown, and people are prevented from going where they wish by violence and the threat of violence, there damn well should have been some arrests.

If you allow violence, violence will escalate. Hence the shooting. My guess is that someone who was unaware of events was suspected of attempting to attend the meeting, probably wrongly, was attacked, and defended himself. Because that is what happens when some privileged people are allowed to engage in violence with impunity. The police presence is to not to keep ordinary people safe, but to enable impunity, to keep those who are attacking people safe.

Smoke grenades and such are merely providing the drama to entertain violent people. Violent people need to be arrested and removed from society.

31 Responses to “Police fine with left wing violence”

  1. Steel T Post says:

    Time to reconquer the Hillary “islands.” What is the exact number – Trump won like 3000 counties, and Hillary won 50? I’ve seen it somewhere.

  2. Cavalier says:

    Remove enough violent people from society, breed out the war strain, pacify the population, make impossible spontaneous organized violence necessary beat even the hilariously effeminate leftists at basic-tier street-level violence.

    Ultimate result: too civilized.

    Moslems would never have stood for this. They would have blown right through the “blockade”, because they have spines.

    • Jack Highlands says:

      Well put, Cavalier. Very few on the Alt Right take Pinkerism to its logical conclusion (certainly Pinker doesn’t).

      Natural selection is about balance. The West has become too trusting, and so highly intelligent (((parasites))) have hacked our trust. We broke up our clans, and clannish kebab are breaking our heads. We executed our violent, and violent Dindus are executing riots with impunity.

      N00bs on the Alt Right always ask ‘what happened to the Swedes?’ Here’s the answer: they literally are not the genetic men their Goth and Viking ancestors were just a thousand years ago.

      Jim likes to say that repro-age women need sex, and plenty of it. Well, third chimpanzees need violence and plenty of it. Including the descendants of the greatest warriors this planet has ever known. I’d say Cossacks have it about right for these time. And look: they still live right in the middle of the Aryan Steppe.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtNt01zUTIQ

      • jim says:

        We need to reintroduce dueling for the better class of males and distribute police functions to all men of property – so that men of property will be attractive to females, so that female preferences will be eugenic rather than dysgenic.

        Obviously we need to coerce and repress female sexual choice, but there is a limit to how far coercion will get us. We also have to reorganize society so that women will find the guy with the corner office more attractive than a low IQ tattoed thug who lives off burglary, drug dealing, and his numerous high IQ high socioeconomic status girlfriends.

        For hypergamy to be eugenic, high IQ affluent males have to engage in a lot more violence, which means that society must authorize a lot more violence by high status males.

        • Alan J. Perrick says:

          No team-building without grace, “Jim”. You may, however, dream.

          A.J.P.

        • Cavalier says:

          There are no men of property. Our elite is not a landed aristocracy, nor is our elite likely ever to be a landed aristocracy again. The intensely territorial landed aristocracy was replaced by the Industrial Revolution-generated corporate class, a class which to no one’s great surprise is concentrated in the cities, rooted in business and finance, and looks a whole lot more like a White Jewry than it does a warrior elite.

          Economics > Religion/Ideology

          • peppermint says:

            do you *feel* in charge?

          • jim says:

            Trump is a man of property. And so is everyone who is substantially above water on his mortgage.

            • Cavalier says:

              Nope. The old barons and dukes and what-have-you were self-sufficient and secure in their position in a way that we inherently are not. They were fundamentally agricultural, and had their own economic “generators” not subject to the whims of some bureaucrat somewhere.

              Trump may be realistically argued to be a man of property, but men like him are exceedingly few, and he has managed to hold on to his position in the face of government which would love to rob him blind largely thanks to his personal charisma.

              Men with mortgages on McMansions, men of property? Lol.

              • Oliver Cromwell says:

                The middle class used to mean people who were rich enough that they did not need to work, but were not rich enough that they generally chose not to work. There used to be a rural middle class, which was often people living on self-sufficient farms. But there was also an urban middle class, composed of people who could afford to live off investments. There still is, but taxation has shrunk it considerably. Reading between the lines, Moldbug is urban middle class, and so perhaps is jim.

                • Cavalier says:

                  In any case, the social impetus for dueling comes from a society dominated by a landed aristocracy and its ancient martial traditions, not one headed by merchants, businessmen, financiers, lawyers, clergy, etc.

                • jim says:

                  That is true, but women are what they are.

                  By nature I am an easy going guy who would rather make concessions to avoid conflict, but that is not the man who scores the chicks, so I cultivate my violent narcissistic asshole.

                • Oliver Cromwell says:

                  In the bad old days, even dweeby mathematicians would fight duels.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89variste_Galois#Final_days

                  “Don’t cry, Alfred! I need all my courage to die at twenty.”

                  Very unfortunate for mathematics.

            • Steel T Post says:

              “You ain’t no kind of man if you ain’t got land.” -Delmar O’Donnell

        • Pseudo-chrysostom says:

          New dogma: positions of authority in the clerissy are now select for by sub grappling competition: the thinking mans combat sport.

  3. TheBigH says:

    Trump should have the DOJ file a civil rights lawsuit against the city of Seattle for violating the civil rights of the people trying to attend.

  4. Anon says:

    Woman police. Great. Go Seattle.

    • Alan J. Perrick says:

      Haha, they’re already starting from behind. Can’t understand why people allow women those jobs except that they’re decadent.

      A.J.P.

  5. Cloudswrest says:

    Here’s a video of the shooting. The shooter appears to be the man in the yellow hat. It appears he is being set upon by a mob when he shoots.

    https://vid.me/V3JL

    • Cloudswrest says:

      “Following investigation of the details surrounding the incident, and in consultation with the prosecuting attorney’s office, the suspects were released pending further investigation,” a UW Police Department spokesperson said in a statement. “No suspects remain outstanding.”

      Translation – Unfortunately, do to video, it looks like it was obviously self defense.

      http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Breitbart-editor-s-UW-speech-delayed-as-protest-10873273.php

    • jim says:

      Recap of the video:

      A huge yell goes up from the crowd, and they surge towards a short guy in a yellow hat. They clearly intend to beat the shit out of him. He pulls a gun, the crowd is unimpressed. He fires the gun. Now the crowd is impressed.

      Was he a Trumpist, a Miloist, or a protestor? He was in the middle of the protestors. Maybe he was a protestor who committed heresy? Maybe he was protestor, but one of the protest leaders outed him as a spy, an entryist, an infiltrator, or a Miloist secret agent? Whatever, he reasonably feared for his life.

  6. Alrenous says:

    More precisely, police chiefs fine with left wing violence, being as they’re selected for precisely that, and grunts fine with following orders and never resign in protest.

  7. Jack Highlands says:

    Let us know as soon as Who? and Whom? are established in terms of Us and Them.

  8. SteveRogers42 says:

    How cops are “trained” in Washington:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXeiWdYa5Rw

  9. vxxc2014 says:

    One police chief in SEATTLE and a woman at that is fine with Lefty violence.

    That /= The Police.

Leave a Reply