Archive for the ‘economics’ Category

Wishing for a chinese crash

Friday, May 7th, 2010

Lots and lots of people are predicting China will crash, though The Money Illusion doubts it. Supposedly, debt fueled construction, decreed by central planners, Soviet style, is sixty percent of GDP – except that there is absolutely no evidence that this remarkable statistic is true.  It is not an official government statistic.  Where does it come from?   If it was sixty percent of GDP, most of the population would be working in construction, which obviously they are not.

People want to believe that China will crash.

Who wants to believe that China will crash?

The people who believe that China will crash also believe that China is a command economy, which obviously it no longer is, except in the sense that Europe is a command economy, and America has recently become a command economy.  They also believe in Soviet growth statistics – that the Soviet Union grew just great, at least at first.

Further, those who believe that China will crash, also believe it has already crashed: that China’s prosperity is based on forcing
peasants into grinding poverty in sweatshops on two dollars a day, that China has no middle class (hence the supposed absurdity of the present building boom in china creating vast amounts of middle class housing, offices, and shops), and that Cuba’s quite astonishing health statistics are true.

Their beliefs about China are incoherent, internally inconsistent, and mutually contradictory, showing that they don’t really believe what they believe.  I suspect that what they really believe is that basing a society on self interest is morally wrong, and therefore must surely be punished by the heavens. Obviously the right way to run a society is to put people like themselves, who know what is good for society, in charge and then make everyone else do what is good for society, and any society that allows greed to run riot is obviously doomed.  Therefore, they subconsciously think, China is obviously doomed, due all the rampant greed that is not properly restrained by good government.

I just don’t hear any one who confidently and sincerely believes that self interest is the proper basis for a society, predicting doom for China.

No doubt China will have a recession, sooner or later.  No doubt some speculators will lose their shirts, sooner or later, for in a free economy, speculators take risks, unlike America where the elite gets bailed out by taxpayers when they bungle, but China is growing mightily, and will continue to grow mightily, with the usual minor interruptions from time to time.

Tough on wall street

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

Obama has a announced a great pile of trillion dollar giveaways to Wall Street, and called it tough regulation, though each of these regulations protects them from responsibility, while tapping the taxpayer’s veins.  To show how tough they are on Wall Street, congressmen summoned Goldman and Sach’s executives to Washington, and harshly ranted at them for selling their customers securities based on mortgages that they knew or should have known were $##%.

Meanwhile, the FDIC is busily ladeling great helpings of taxpayer money all over Goldman and Sach. (more…)

The crisis explained

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Substantial parts of this article are pillaged wholesale from Ryan Barne’s excellent account of the crisis, and Mortgage Guarantee Insurance’s colorful account of the crisis. I steal from the best. And thanks to the commenters that pointed out numerous errors.

In 2001, the Federal Reserve began cutting rates dramatically, dropping to 1% in 2003, in order to stimulate the economy.

This produced a boom, and especially a housing boom, in 2002.  A housing boom was a rational and appropriate response to the extraordinarily low  interest rate on a 30 year fixed rate mortgage, and no one was asking whether the extraordinarily low interest rates on 30 year fixed rate mortgages were rational and appropriate. (more…)

Basel II and the destruction of civilization as we know it.

Sunday, April 18th, 2010

The US representatives at Basel probably thought themselves political moderates and mainstreamers – being in about the center and mainstream of Harvard University professors and the New York Times – which of course puts them far to the left of the American public, and a great deal further to the left of the people who created the banking system.

At Basel, the Americans were the “right wing”.  The “center” and “mainstream” at Basel was a good deal further left.  Thus the mainstream at Basel were people that the ordinary American would think far left crazies, and that those who reorganized the banking system after the great depression would have thought a bunch of bolshie nut cases who needed to be lined up against a wall and shot.

(more…)

Bank “deregulation”

Monday, April 12th, 2010

It is often claimed that the disaster was produced by deregulation.  What deregulation you may ask?

Well, mostly, the dismantling of Glass-Steagall.  I don’t think dismantling Glass-Steagall caused the crisis, but it is undeniable that if Glass-Steagall had remained in effect, the crisis would have been far less severe, for Glass-Steagall restrained financial institutions from being too big to fail.  It was the biggest institutions, the institutions too big to fail, that behaved the worst, and lost the largest proportion of the assets they managed.  Glass-Steagall also prevented financial institutions from all being “diversified” in exactly the same way, which “diversification” is not very diverse at all.

So why, and how, was Glass-Steagall dismantled?  It was dismantled by being replaced and superseded by Basel II.  Glass-Steagall consists of seventeen pages, that a competent person can, with some effort, comprehend.  Basel II consists of thousands of pages, no one knows how many, and no one person knows more than a tiny fraction of what is in these thousands of pages.

That is “deregulation”.

Mortgage Fraud, predatory borrowing:

Friday, April 9th, 2010

There have been numberless highly successful prosecutions for predatory lending, even though there is no plausible evidence that predatory lending has ever happened in recent decades, nor has such evidence ever been presented in court, nor is it plausible that predatory lending could be profitable except for lenders who break the borrowers legs and arms in the event of default. (more…)

Why socialism needs killing fields

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Bryan Caplan asked why socialism turned out evil and proposed three competing explanations.  Volokh Conspiracy followed up, and a horde of socialists appeared out of the wood work, objecting to the premise of the question, claiming that socialism was just fine.

So time to re-run my golden oldie:  Why socialism needs killing fields(more…)

Capital Controls

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Capital controls are characteristic of third world dictatorships teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.  And now America has capital controls.

How much ruin in a nation?

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

On the one hand, there is a lot of ruin in a nation. On the other hand, that which cannot continue, will stop. The present level of government spending is unsustainable.

At what point then, do we get general collapse? (more…)

No moderate Islam, and not many moderate Muslims

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

How many Muslims are moderate? In the recent Iraq election, moderates gained, just barely, a plurality. Not a majority, a plurality. To govern, they will need the support of some violently immoderate people. They have a plurality because the various different kinds of extremist hate each other, splitting the extremist vote. (more…)