Jian Ghomeshi rape case

Umpteen different women accused Jian Ghomeshi of raping them. He was rightly acquitted.

Reading the evidence, I interpret it as indicating that he was so besieged by hot chicks that he generally would not date the same woman twice. When he dated a woman he would rough her up to turn her on. This sometimes resulted in her becoming so sexually excited she would have sex with him on the first date. In which case he when he was finished using her, he would kick her out like a piece of trash. Or if she did not have sex with him on the first date, he would also kick her out like a piece of trash, presumably because he expected the next date to be more compliant.

She would then pursue him in email and in person, offering quick casual sex in language that became ever plainer and more direct, which contacts he politely or rudely ignored. This is a man who having had a woman once, would continually turn down offers to have her again.

Some women, after being ignored in this manner, then charged him with sexual assault. These were the classic failure-to-booty-call rape accusations.

Jian Ghomeshi is tolerably good looking, but not exceptionally handsome. He is not charismatic. He is mildly famous and mildly influential. He is not particularly narcissistic. I conjecture that the chief reason for his success with women was that he is just naturally and instinctively a total asshole with a tendency to sadistic violence.

Progressive degenerates define BDSM as role playing – safe words and all that. He states that he never role played – which would indicate Ghomeshi got real, rather than pretended, submission from women.

Ghomeshi piously claimed to be a feminist, which is a piety that is absolutely mandatory for someone with his kind of job, but in practice always treated women as they love to be treated – like domestic animals.

He is Iranian by ancestry, therefore may have been raised redpilled.

68 Responses to “Jian Ghomeshi rape case”

  1. Mister Grumpus says:

    (‘Them Persian fellows ARE renowned for being sexy assholes.)

    Here’s a question for you Jim:

    How do you manage to avoid finding women dishonest, crazy, dangerous and/or repulsive after making such conscious observations about them (the accuracy of which I’m in no way contesting, BTW)?

    (And no, I don’t get laid often, which is made obvious anyway by the simple fact of my asking. Even I know that.)

    Like a pygmie observing a rocket launch, I observe that the fellows most successful with and comfortable around women are also those who understand that they’re duplicitous opportunistic disloyal back-stabbing animals. How can this be? Clearly there are principles at work here that I don’t in any way understand. I confess!

    • peppermint says:

      you don’t think of them as men. if they were men they’d be as you say.

      you probably already act like cats and dogs are cats and dogs instead of acting like they’re men.

      also, you can be somewhat comfortable hanging out with niggers if you understand that will behave like niggers, which means in particular not trying to explain stuff and take pride in logic and adherence to philosophy the way Whites always do, because they consider that annoying, and always ensuring that you display the level of respect that you think is suitable, because if you don’t, they’ll chimp out at you.

      your girlfriend can not be your best friend, though, of course, if you ask her, she will try to be, because she is programmed to try to please you.

      • Mister Grumpus says:

        Did I work out on your blog that you live in Asia somewhere, P-Mint?

        • peppermint says:

          No, that’s Spandrell, the chair of the department of oriental studies bloodyshovel.wordpress.com ). I’m an American Nazi living in America, like Andrew Anglin but with less blog traffic.

    • jim says:

      They are not duplicitous backstabbing etc. Women need to be owned, and they are just testing you to make sure they have a strong owner. If they smell weakness, yes, then trouble ensues.

      Roger Elliot was traumatized for life by his first shit test. Should have understood that the harshness of the shit test meant that she was sexually turned on.

      • Denny says:

        They need to be owned structurally, officially, acknowledged as such by the culture and the state. Only then can the shitshow end and we can get back to doing what we should be. The amount of time and energy spent on this pursuit can be used elsewhere for much good, instead we are wasting it doing what previous generations already had as a given. Remember all, game is fine and dandy, but the aim should be structural, open, structural, structural and…structural. If you are not ‘feeling’ that, then you probably aren’t interested in preserving and improving Europe and North America.

        • Mycroft Jones says:

          I agree, and the last 15 years have been bent toward that goal. If you are interested in my findings so far, look me up. We should correspond.

        • Well put. There has to be a frame at a social and cultural level that is aimed at bringing women into a civilizational mindset. Otherwise things collapse very quickly.

      • Mister Grumpus says:

        …and you’re implying that once you’ve successfully put her under that owned condition, you find yourself naturally having positive feelings towards her?

        See, it’s the what’s-in-it-for-me part that’s an known-unknown for me also.

        • jim says:

          Sure. The natural behavior of women is to look after their man.

          In the current environment this often takes the perverse form of a woman receiving child support money and blowing it all on demon lovers who show up briefly to take her money and beat her children. But when it manifests in its normal, healthy, and proper form, where the man contributes manly things to the household, and the woman contributes womanly things, you are going to like the woman who looks after you.

          • Mister Grumpus says:

            (Thanksbuddy. I know this is remedial classes stuff, but it’s where I’m at.)

            > But when it manifests in its normal, healthy, and
            > proper form, where the man contributes manly
            > things to the household, and the woman contributes
            > womanly things, you are going to like the woman
            > who looks after you.

            Is there, like, a theme park where I can go to observe this kind of thing?

            • jim says:

              Old movies, for example “Cheaper by the dozen”.

              Old TV shows, “I love Lucy”. Early episodes of “As the world turns”

              Download them from the Pirate Bay using bittorrent.

              But these will just show you what a normal relationship between a man and a woman looks like. Does not tell you how to establish a normal relationship in these more difficult times.

              Every successful marriage is quietly and furtively eighteenth century, even though functional and healthy marriages were criminalized in the nineteenth century.

              Keep in mind that normal functional marriages and normal sexual relationships have been criminalized since the mid nineteenth century, so to establish one you need to be a bit of a desperado who is capable of breaking the rules and breaking laws. You need to be the wild one.

              Though normal heterosexual relationships were criminalized in the nineteenth century these laws were so contrary to nature, custom, and social mores as to universally ignored until the sixties and early seventies, when they started to get tough about enforcing them, and socializing people to obey them. Since you need to disobey current laws and social mores, since you need to resist your socialization, you need to be an anti social delinquent asshole, which you will not see depicted in these shows. But these shows will show you where you should be headed to, even though they are unrealistic about how to get there.

  2. Alan J. Perrick says:

    There’s a different standards for browns, “Jim”.

    No, browns are not welcome, even if they are against the Cathedral.

    A.J.P.

    • peppermint says:

      OK, but the only standards under which we can say he raped those women are the feminist “sex is rape if it’s not part of a personally fulfilling or otherwise recognized as positive relationship (e.g. forced sex from niggers)” or the Nazi “sex between mud “people” and White women is rape”.

      Since the second standard is currently and for the foreseeable future outside the Overton window and a violation of international and US law, all we can do is signal against the first, which is what was just put to trial and rejected.

    • peppermint says:

      Earl Warren, Methodist
      Potter Stewart, Episcopalien
      Byron White, Episcopalien
      William O. Douglas, Presbyterian
      Tom C Clark, Presbyterian
      John Marshall Harlan II, Presbyterian

      Hugo Black

      William Brennen, Trentian

      Abe Fortas, filthy rat kike

      Daily reminder that those six WASP cucks voted for miscegenation and the understanding that marriage is about feels not children.

      Daily reminder that those three Episcopaliens and former Klansman Hugo Black decided that the state of their souls and the souls of Whites in the US are more imperiled by hate than their families and White families across the country are threatened by miscegenation.

      Daily reminder that thousands and thousands of young White women, including White women I have personally known or have family ties to, have been fed to niggers by lying cuckstains who only care for their precious souls.

      • Alan J. Perrick says:

        [A.J.P. cannot be heard because Peppermint is typing so loudly]

      • Minion says:

        I would not be too hard on the Wasps tho. I mean, the Templeton Foundation and the Witherspoon Institute (both Episcopilian organizations) do actively promote socially conservative thought.

        The Witherspoon Institute, for example, gives platform to Daniel Haqiqatjou (he is an anti-liberal/redpill reactionary Muslim thinker- google him), so WASPS cant all be that bad.

    • Minion says:

      Persians are literally Aryans, therefore, Persians are white. We just tan a little easily under the scorching Middle Eastern sun, but that’s it.

      Also, Muslim browns (and brown-allied whites- eg Chechens and converts to Islam) are the only ones resisting the cathedral on a large scale. Western Whites, on the other hand, are the vanguards of the Cathedral, actively promoting its doctrines around the world.

      • Dave says:

        Don’t waste your breathe on some of these guys. I’m half Neapolitan and half Polish and as far as most WN’s and many NRX’s are concerned, that makes me non white.
        I’ve known several Persians, none of them darker than your average Greek or Italian.
        They were well educated and perfect gentlemen, better people than many American whites, but will never be accepted as white, at least not around these parts.
        Same goes for red haired, green eyed Chechens and Dagestanis. I’ve met a couple and if even 10% of the white male population of the U.S. and Europe were as tough and uncompromising as those guys our problems in the West would be over very quickly.
        Alas, around here they are not white and never will be.

  3. Dave says:

    I’m surprised that no one has yet accused Roosh V of sexual assault or rape. Whatever natural Persian charm these men possess seems not to work on Persian women; Iran’s TFR is down to 1.85, and would probably be lower if not for tribal minorities like Arabs, Kurds, and Balochs.

    • Minion says:

      Iranian women are major whores (besides my mom and women of her generation and back- think 1950’s, before the Shah cucked us with Wesernization).

      Like Western women, they just fuck around while sterilized, hence the low TFR. Low TFR suggests use of birth control, not a lack of sex. Every other married Iranian woman is fucking outside of marriage these days, its normal and expected.

      Nuke Tehran now. Only geopolitcally irrelevant conservative villages and towns should remain in the Middle East.

  4. Glenfilthie says:

    LOL. Listen to you boys! LOL!

    Oh man, you fellas are a laugh riot. Ghomeshi wasn’t ‘raised red pill’, he was raised ‘mudflap’. He’s an ignorant savage putting on airs of civility and got busted when he couldn’t keep up the charade. For liberals and progs the story never gets old. If you go round humping liberal women this is what happens. Serves him right that the legal fees bankrupted him.

    But what really makes me laugh is this crap about women being livestock. HAR HAR HAR – boys, if you wanna think that way go ahead – but don’t bitch when you end up with a slow witted cow for a wife because it’s all your fault.

    The secret to a good, wholesome classical marriage is not treating women like animals – but rather a classical courtship. Long courtships, chaperoned outings, and getting to actually know your potential mate before screwing it. If you jump into bed with any piece of idiotic trash that comes along you deserve what you get.

    For me – my wife is smarter than pretty much all of you and twice as capable. Mind you, I won’t settle for cattle like you boys will. 😉

    • Epimetheus says:

      You go grrl!

    • jim says:

      Ghomeshi wasn’t ‘raised red pill’, he was raised ‘mudflap’. He’s an ignorant savage putting on airs of civility and got busted when he couldn’t keep up the charade

      Ghomeshi got laid like a rug. That is red pill. He had more women seeking booty calls than he had time and energy to bang.

      But what really makes me laugh is this crap about women being livestock. HAR HAR HAR

      Works.

      getting to actually know your potential mate before screwing it.

      In all of human history, most marriages have resembled the marriage of Isaac and Rebekah – purchase or abduction. Abraham’s servant purchased Rebekah the day that he met her. Isaac met Rebekah after he was married to her, and had sex with her half an hour or so after meeting her. She introduced herself to him after his morning prayer, and they had sex before breakfast.

      • glenfilthie says:

        Ghomeshi screwed tire biters, skanks and whores. He was an idiot that believed in ‘free love’ and paid the price for it. I wouldn’t screw them with your dink, Jim…are you sure that red pill isn’t a Lifesaver? 🙂

        Sure, treating women like livestock works – if you wanna marry a cow. That ain’t good enough for me – in this day and age if you want to get ahead and live the good life, you need a wife as smart and resourceful as you are.

        Perhaps I mispoke about ‘classical marriage’. If you want a happy marriage that lasts – one that allows a man and wife to pool resources and divide labour … One that allows you both to operate as an effective team – you won’t get that from a subservient cow.

        Hey – if these boys wanna worship that mutt as some kind of hero go ahead – I guess clowns need role models too.

        • jim says:

          Ghomeshi screwed tire biters, skanks and whores

          Ghomeshi had umpteen hot women seeking sex with him for years on end without him responding to them or encouraging them. He did better than president Clinton.

          Perhaps I mispoke about ‘classical marriage’. If you want a happy marriage that lasts – one that allows a man and wife to pool resources and divide labour … One that allows you both to operate as an effective team – you won’t get that from a subservient cow.

          All successful marriages that I have observed are quietly eighteenth century, conform to Saint Paul’s prescription for the relationship of wife and husband. All that fail to conform to his prescription, break up – usually with the wife irresponsibly and destructively spending the family assets and recklessly endangering her children.

          If a wife does not submit to her husband, she does not view the family assets as something to be conserved, but as something to be plundered and ravaged. If a wife does not submit, there is no us, no one flesh,no cooperation. There is no team, for a team needs a captain.

          My wife was a very smart woman, and she did my tax returns etc and made most of the decisions – but she made them in accordance with my directives. When in doubt as to what I would have decided, she brought the issue to me. When she made a decision wrongly, I reprimanded her. If she kept making wrong decisions, I would reprimand her sternly and take over that area.

          She found the house in which I now live – I told her what sort of a house to look for, she made a list, and then we went together to check out houses on the list. When we came to this house I told her we would buy this house. She negotiated. She hammered the seller down a considerable way, and told me she was confident he would drop another thousand. (She was very good at judging the lowest price that someone would take, and the highest price they would pay.) I told her no, we would pay rather than risk the house getting away. And so, that was that. I paid, and we moved in.

          • Art says:

            Jim:
            “My wife was a very smart woman, and she did my tax returns etc and made most of the decisions…”

            Would it be fair to say that you treat your wife like a cow?

            • jim says:

              It would be fair to say that I own my wife.

              One does not treat a wife like a cow any more than one would treat a cat like a dog.

    • Ray Manta says:

      Glenfilthie said:

      > Long courtships, chaperoned outings, and getting to actually know your potential mate
      > before screwing it.

      It’s debatable that long courtships are that beneficial. Just how long do they really need to be? Jim has mentioned arrangements where unattached women in late 18th-century Australia were simply assigned men and it worked out tolerably well. I’ve also known of arranged marriages where the bride and groom met for only a brief time before the wedding that are still going strong.

      > For me – my wife is smarter than pretty much all of you and twice as capable.

      I’m sure your virtue signalling is leaving everyone here in speechless awe.

      • glenfilthie says:

        LOL. I love the jargon and buzz words you children deploy as you put on airs of intellectualism! Sorry kid- but the progs and feminists see as much virtue in me or less than you do!

        The human animal is not meant to be promiscuous or polygamous. Those cultures that extoll those behaviours always weaken and fall. You can’t build strong nations on weak communities. Strong communities can’t be built on weak families.

        Ghomeshi is a weak, flawed man – and now he’s a pariah and broke. Justice is served.

        • jim says:

          Ghomeshi is a weak, flawed man – and now he’s a pariah and broke. Justice is served.

          He still gets fresh pussy every night.

        • jim says:

          The human animal is not meant to be promiscuous or polygamous

          He is most certainly meant to polygynous. We are