Roissy has a couple of great posts about the war on masculinity “Belittle League” and “The medicalization of maleness”
War on masculinity
October 28th, 2010The supposedly unelectable Sarah Palin
October 26th, 2010The Democrats assure Republicans that Sarah Palin is unelectable, and that for her to be nominated for president in 2012 is their wet dream, because it would assure Obama of a second term, that if Republican nominate Sarah Palin, Democrats will be celebrating.
At the same time, the Democrats are quietly pushing the supposedly much more electable Michael Rubens Bloomberg as Republican presidential candidate in 2012, creating opportunities for him to receive favorable publicity, giving him lots of respect in Democrat controlled publications. If he is so much more electable, why are the Democrats pushing him and mobilizing to prevent Sarah Palin from getting the nomination?
Never accept advice from your enemies.
The White House misses no opportunity to get the supposedly highly electable Michael Rubens Bloomberg some favorable publicity – Obama golfs with him, floats his name as treasury secretary, conspicuously sends prominent members of his government to conspicuously seek Bloomberg’s supposedly wise advice. If I ask someone’s advice, I do not announce it with a fanfare.
This is mighty odd behavior for a White house that supposedly would celebrating if the supposedly hopelessly unelectable Sarah Barracuda gets the nomination, rather than the supposedly terrifyingly electable Michael Rubens Bloomberg. As they miss no opportunity to tell us they hope for Sarah Palin’s nomination, they also miss no opportunity to tell us they are terrified of Bloomberg’s nomination – and miss no opportunity to make Bloomberg’s nomination happen.
Sarah Palin proposes an insignificantly tiny reform
October 22nd, 2010Sarah Palin observes that National Public Radio has purged one of its commentators for mentioning the unmentionable, and suggests that National Public Radio be defunded for silencing debate and attempting to promote ignorance. Several other prominent Republicans have said the same thing, or endorsed Sarah Palin saying it, Sarah Palin being merely the most famous and influential of more republicans than I can shake a stick at.
This is a tiny, tiny, step towards defunding the left. To actually defund the left, need to abolish the illegal and unconstitutional departments of Education and energy, the National Endowment for the arts, and the environmental Protection Agency.
Of course if we cannot roll back Basel, despite the fact that under Basel’s regime of politicized lending the entire banking system of the west has been leaking vast amounts of money and continues to do so, we cannot roll back funding for the left.
Numerous blogs are thrilled because a noted political leader has proposed we actually move slightly right, rather than merely proposing we move left slightly slower, and promptly been supported by lot more: x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, and more blogs than I can shake a stick at.
The thrilled response to Sarah Palin’s suggestion shows how rare such suggestions are.
Who fortold the financial crisis?
October 20th, 2010Winning will be another Republican disaster
October 20th, 2010Everyone on the Republican side is sucking up to the anti capitalist left – including Sarah Palin and Christine O’Donnel. None have the will to reverse the policies that are ruining the economy, making the middle class poor and insecure.
So, when elected, will get the blame for the consequences of these policies. Since the supposedly hard core capitalism of the Republicans will not work, obviously the solution must be more socialism.
Sarbanes–Oxley, the regulatory door revolving, and Basel, have installed in power a permanent business elite that cannot lose power no matter how incompetently they screw up, and cannot be prosecuted no matter what criminal deeds they commit – foreclosuregate, the ratings agencies, and the leadership of the too-big-to-fail banks being examples of this problem.
The regulatory apparatus that locks this elite in place and protects them against market forces has to be removed – a program that is unthinkably and unimaginably radical, far more extreme than the most extreme of the supposedly extreme tea party candidates.
The problem is not the dramatic expansion of government spending. The problem is the vastly more dramatic explosion of the regulatory state such as, for example Sarbanes–Oxley, which has largely criminalized the great engine of jobs creation, ended the formation of new small businesses, and Basel, which gives the state, and such private enterprises as the state chooses to privilege, the task of assessing financial risk.
Elections do not matter.
October 18th, 2010The most extreme of the “right wing” candidates are proposing measures far too feeble to make a difference. Consider for example, the mortgage scandal. Where is the candidate that suggests that to fix our financial system, the bums (the entire financial sector of wall street and the regulators to which they are connected by a revolving door) need to be fired for incompetence and imprisoned for fraud?
A lot of people are proposing “solutions” for the mortgage crisis – but all these “solutions” propose that the people in charge of the too-big-to-fail banks and their regulators will remain powerful, important, and out of jail, despite demonstrated criminality and gross incompetence.
The ruling elite has lost the capacity to discipline itself. Power is slipping out of their feeble hands, falling into the street.
Our society has reached that awkward state, too late for reform, too soon to shoot the bums, but that stage is usually irreversible. It will eventually reach the time to shoot the bums stage.
Illegality by our elite is provoking illegality by ordinary middle class people.
As Market Ticker tells us:
This is where lawlessness leads us – to more lawlessness. Once you commit a lawless act against someone and are not punished for it you have invited them to retaliate with complete disregard for the law in their response. You are only required to deal ethically and morally with an ethical and moral entity across the table – one who ignores the law loses their right to demand that respect in return.
This mess begins with the securitization and sale of these mortgages in the first instance. It begins with whether or not the original banks actually transferred the notes at all (there’s plenty of evidence they did not) and whether the representations and warranties were complied with when these securities were sold to investors (we know in many cases – if not all – they were not, from FCIC sworn testimony.)
We have turned a blind eye to these lawless acts for the better part of a decade – not one indictment has issued for securities fraud over these matters. And it’s not just mortgages – we know banks were involved in ripping off communities such as Jefferson County, we know they are alleged to have been involved in rigging municipal debt offerings (which raised the cost of living for everyone through higher taxes) and yet not one bank officer or bank itself has been placed under indictment for any of it. Further, the FBI warned in 2004 of an “epidemic” (their words) of mortgage fraud, and instead of it being prosecuted the agents were pulled and reassigned.
We have had two sequential administrations – Bush and now Obama – that have intentionally refused to prosecute any of this lawless behavior. This refusal continues to this very day with admissions in depositions under oath of the commission of literal tens of thousands of felonies per month (each instance of falsely swearing before a court is a separate count of fraud upon the court and, in the case of “robosigning”, forgery – affixing a notary’s signature by other than the actual notary.) Yet despite this having been confirmed in multiple depositions going back several months not one indictment has issued thus far and Attorneys General talk about not wanting to “upset” the banks or the “economy.”
The whitewash proceeds
October 16th, 2010One of the bigger criminals in the mortgage scam was Former Countrywide CEO Mozilo. The SEC has made a symbolic settlement with him and a couple of his accomplices for seventy two million dollars, not a dime of which he has to pay personally, and which would be peanuts even if he had to pay it personally. As a part of the agreement, all potentially embarrassing details associated with his crimes are sealed from nosy outsiders.
What little money will be paid, will be paid from an escrow fund the company set up to cover shareholder litigation – and since Countrywide was taken over by the FDIC, this means that the government is paying the money to itself.
The enormous mortgage-bond scandal
October 15th, 2010Felix Salmon has found an interesting document in the financial crisis inquiry hearings.
It seems the banks not only knew that the loans they were selling to investors generally failed to meet underwriting standards, they were so careless as to have documents lying around saying so in plain English.
Seems like they were a bank of morons. When I was involved in criminal conspiracies, none of us would write in plain English, and we would very rarely speak in plain English.
But if you are a regular visitor to his blog, that we are ruled by dim witted criminals is unlikely to surprise you. What has, however, surprised me, is that the political branch of the conspiracy failed to swiftly throw the bankster branch to the wolves and blame them for everything. If I was in Obama’s shoes, in 2009 I would have been preparing federal prosecutions to generate interesting headlines just before the 2010 mid term elections, but instead both political parties continue in cover up mode.
The ruling elite is too soft on each other to hold on to power for very much longer. As soon as we get a really big crisis, are likely to fall.
Foreclosure fraud chaos
October 14th, 2010Pines and Associates reports that:
Most [mortgage] loans are securitized and most investors have filed class action suits. He finds those suits and joins them on behalf of clients as a “special interest” in the suit.
This is Armageddon for the financial system. The underlying problem is that finance runs on trust, and these days they are all crooks, so the entire financial system has seized up.
Any solution to the problem that could possibly work is far more drastic than anything proposed by anyone on either side of politics. For starters, you would have to send everyone involved in the CRA scam to prison, roll affirmative action back all the way to Marie Curie, and that is only the beginning of what is needed.
Conspiracy
October 14th, 2010If you watch the reality show “survivor”, you will have noticed that in any power struggle, the winners usually have invisible connections – there is a group that conceals from outsiders that it is a group. Conspiracy tends to be a substantial part of any winning strategy. Conspiracies are therefore as common as cockroaches and crabgrass. Conspiracy theory has a deserved bad name because it tends to be invoked to explain away unwanted evidence, as for example Chomsky explaining that the Khmer Rouge were good guys under attack by the CIA, shortly before he explained that they were bad guys installed in power by the CIA.
But while we should not believe in conspiracies with the ability to program millions of refugees to say unkind things about noble mild mannered agrarian reformers, nor conspiracies that can bring out large mobs on the streets to lynch beloved leaders of the proletariat, we should believe in conspiracies that link together a handful of powerful people in a handful of powerful, but supposedly separate and independent, organizations. The state department really was full of commies.
By definition, a conspiracy is small. Astroturf, therefore is a signature of conspiracy. If there is a real mob in the streets, a conspiracy is unlikely to have much control over it.
Another good signature of conspiracy is people mysteriously rising to power from nowhere, as the current leader of the British Labor party. Ed Miliband has a mysteriously invisible powerbase. Before 2005, no one had heard of him. Then he is nominated to a safe seat – which usually only happens to people who have been working for years to inherit the seat, promptly becomes minister, and then, leader of the labor party.
Tracing connections, we find a lot of odd links between the London School of Economics, the people who made the 10:10 no pressure video, and Ed Miliband – revealing the presence of a greenie conspiracy that is
- Powerful
- Composed of morons
- Unable to get its agenda through